The problem and the model
A defined benefit plan promises a pension set by a formula, for example 1.5% of final pay for each year of service. The employer bears the risk that the money will be enough. The actuary answers two different questions: what the promise is worth today (valuation) and at what pace to contribute to pay for it (funding). The first depends on the assumptions; the second also depends on the cost method.
The basic model follows each active participant through a service table with several decrements: death, disability, withdrawal and retirement. Their probabilities combine into a total probability of remaining in service, and expected cash flows are discounted at the valuation interest rate. On that skeleton sit the salary scale, the benefit formula, vesting, payment forms and ancillary benefits.
q(τ) is the total probability of leaving active service for any cause; l(τ) is the service table and v = 1/(1 + i).
Br is the projected annual pension with k per year of service and projected final or average pay S̄r; ä(12)r is the monthly life annuity due at retirement age.
With salary scale s. It is the denominator of methods that express cost as a percent of payroll.
Normal cost, liability and the fundamental equation
Every cost method splits the present value of future benefits between past and future. The part attributed to service already rendered is the actuarial (accrued) liability; the part charged in each future year is the normal cost. The difference between the liability and assets is the unfunded liability, which is amortized over a period.
The balance equation is the same for all: today's liability plus normal cost, accumulated with interest, covers next year's expected liability for those who remain, plus benefits paid during the year. When experience differs from the assumptions, actuarial gains or losses arise, and each method treats them differently.
The present value of future benefits splits into the actuarial liability (past service) and the present value of future normal costs.
The first equality holds if experience matches the assumptions. G is the year's actuarial gain: expected unfunded liability less actual, with contribution C at mid-year.
Funding methods (actuarial cost methods)
Methods fall into two families. Accrued benefit methods (unit credit) assign to each year the benefit earned in it, so cost rises with the participant's age. Projected benefit methods (entry age normal, aggregate, frozen initial liability, attained age normal) spread the total cost evenly, which gives steadier contributions and funds earlier. No method changes the ultimate cost of the plan, which depends on benefits paid and investment returns earned; they change the pace and volatility of contributions.
Traditional unit credit
The liability is the present value of the benefit already accrued on current pay; the normal cost is the present value of the benefit accruing during the year, including the effect of the pay increase on past service.
The basis of the funding target for US single-employer plans and of termination valuations.
Projected unit credit
Projects the benefit on expected pay at retirement and allocates it equally to each year of service. It is the method required by NIF D-3 and IAS 19 for defined benefit obligations.
Cost rises with age; the accounting standard in Mexico and internationally.
Entry age normal
The normal cost is a level premium, in dollars or as a percent of pay, from entry age to retirement that exactly funds the projected benefit. The liability is the present value of benefits less the present value of future normal costs.
The most common method in public plans; it gives stable costs as a percent of payroll.
Aggregate
Spreads the entire unfunded present value of benefits over future costs without separating an initial liability. Gains and losses are automatically absorbed into the cost of later years.
Simple and self-correcting, but it does not isolate the past service deficit.
Frozen initial liability (FIL)
Sets an initial unfunded liability at the start, computed on an entry age basis, which is amortized separately; the rest is funded as under the aggregate method. Later gains and losses are spread through future normal cost.
Combines explicit amortization of past service with gradual absorption of deviations.
Attained age normal
In US practice (frozen attained age), the initial unfunded liability is computed under unit credit and amortized separately; the cost of benefits not yet accrued is spread from attained age over future service, and gains and losses flow into future normal cost.
In UK practice the name can refer to a different, non-frozen variant; state which one is used.
Assets, amortization and gains
The unfunded liability is amortized over a fixed, open or closed period, in level amounts or as a rising percent of payroll. Assets may be valued at market or with a smoothing method that recognizes investment gains and losses gradually, usually over five years and within a corridor around market value. The choice is documented in the plan's funding policy.
Gains and losses are analyzed by source: investment, mortality, withdrawal, salary, retirement and changes in assumptions or plan provisions. That analysis lets the actuary revise assumptions based on experience and explain to the sponsor why the contribution changed.
Interactive comparison
Cost method comparison
One active participant in a final average pay defined benefit plan. Illustrative Gompertz mortality (B = 0.00003, c = 1.093), constant withdrawal with no vesting, and an annual life annuity due at retirement. It computes the normal cost and the actuarial liability under five methods.
ERISA and funding in the United States
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) was signed on September 2, 1974. Title I protects participants' rights (reporting, disclosure, fiduciary duties, participation, vesting and funding) and is administered mainly by the Department of Labor; Title II amended the Internal Revenue Code, applied by the IRS; Title III created the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, which enrolls the actuaries who sign plan valuations; and Title IV created the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), the federal insurer of defined benefit pensions.
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 rewrote single-employer funding rules in section 430 of the Code. The minimum required contribution is the target normal cost plus amortization of the shortfall relative to the funding target, the present value of benefits accrued at the start of the year, discounted with three corporate bond segment rates (cash flows at 0 to 5 years, 5 to 20 and over 20). Shortfalls were originally amortized over 7 years; the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 moved this to 15 years, reset prior amortization bases and stabilized rates with a corridor around their 25-year average, which the November 2021 infrastructure law extended.
Section 436 restricts benefits based on the adjusted funding target attainment percentage (AFTAP): below 80%, liability-increasing amendments are barred and accelerated payments are limited, and below 60%, accruals are frozen and accelerated payments are prohibited. Multiemployer plans follow a different regime: a funding standard account (section 431) and a zone system (section 432) with endangered, critical and, since 2014, critical and declining status; ARPA also created a special financial assistance program administered by the PBGC.
Each year the enrolled actuary signs Schedule SB (single employer) or Schedule MB (multiemployer) of Form 5500. For single-employer plans terminating in 2026, the PBGC guarantees at most $7,789.77 a month at age 65 as a straight life annuity, and it has published $8,113.64 for 2027. In professional practice, ASOP No. 4, revised in December 2021, governs how obligations are measured and cost methods are chosen.
Exams and credentials for pension actuaries
Enrolled Actuary: EA-1, EA-2F and EA-2L
The Joint Board sets the exams and the SOA administers them, with ASPPA as cosponsor. EA-1 covers compound interest, life contingencies and demographic analysis; EA-2 Segment L, pension law and the non-funding aspects of ERISA; EA-2 Segment F, funding: minimum required contributions, deductible limits, assumptions and excise taxes. EA-1 and EA-2L are offered in May and EA-2F in November.
Besides the exams, 20 CFR 901.12 requires 36 months of pension experience (or 60 months including 18 of pension experience) within the previous 10 years.
FSA in retirement benefits
Under the flexible FSA pathway, the SOA retired the former tracks and codes. The retirement area is taken through RET 101 Retirement Plan Design and RET 201 Retirement Plan Valuation, with RET 301 for Canadian plan topics. Candidates who pass EA-2F and EA-2L receive credit for RET 201 or for an additional course.
The SOA publishes past RET 201 exam questions as practice material.
IFoA: SP4 and SA4
The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries examines pensions in Pensions and Other Benefits Specialist Principles (SP4) and Pensions and Other Benefits Advanced (SA4), with 2027 syllabi already published.
Focused on the British framework: occupational schemes, technical provisions and the Pensions Regulator.
Valuations and plan registration
Accounting valuations of employee benefits follow NIF D-3 or IAS 19 with projected unit credit. Registering a plan with CONSAR under its rules allows contributions to be excluded from the IMSS contribution base (Social Security Law, article 27, section VIII); plans can be registered electronically or with the opinion of a CONSAR-authorized actuary.
See NIF D-3 and IAS 19 and certification.
Books and sources
The classic pension mathematics texts, with verified records, and the official sources cited on this page. More titles in essential books and where to get them in book suppliers.
- Winklevoss, H. E. (1993). Pension Mathematics with Numerical Illustrations, 2nd ed. Pension Research Council and University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Aitken, W. H. (1996). A Problem-Solving Approach to Pension Funding and Valuation, 2nd ed. ACTEX.
- Anderson, A. W. Pension Mathematics for Actuaries (review in The Actuary, 1985).
- Berin, B. N. The Fundamentals of Pension Mathematics. Actuaries Club of New York; William M. Mercer edition, 1978.
- Public Law 93-406, Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (statute text, September 2, 1974).
- Internal Revenue Code, sección 430: minimum funding standards for single-employer plans.
- Internal Revenue Code, sección 436: benefit restrictions based on funded percentage (AFTAP).
- Internal Revenue Code, sección 431: multiemployer funding standard account.
- Internal Revenue Code, sección 432: endangered, critical and critical and declining status.
- IRS, Notice 2021-48: 15-year amortization and interest rate stabilization under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
- Department of Labor, Form 5500 Schedule MB 2025 (statement by enrolled actuary).
- PBGC, maximum monthly guarantee tables.
- Actuarial Standards Board, ASOP No. 4, revised edition (December 2021).
- Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, examination program booklet, fall 2026.
- 20 CFR parte 901: requirements for enrollment as an enrolled actuary.
- SOA, EA exams.
- SOA, FSA requirements under the flexible pathway.
- IFoA, pensions subjects SP4 and SA4.
- CONSAR, form FF-CONSAR-001 for pension plan registration.
- Record of the Society of Actuaries (1997), Pension Funding session: description of cost methods.